2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the peroxisomal matrix protein import system of different organisms. Exploration of possibilities for developing inhibitors of the import system of trypanosomatids for anti-parasite chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peroxisomes display significant diversity among organisms (63), and the peroxisomes of plants, although less studied than their animal and yeast counterparts, have divergent features in their matrix protein import machinery (64). An example is the GreenCut2 peroxisomal protein AtPEX13 (At3g07560) (65).…”
Section: Functional Meta-analysis Of Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peroxisomes display significant diversity among organisms (63), and the peroxisomes of plants, although less studied than their animal and yeast counterparts, have divergent features in their matrix protein import machinery (64). An example is the GreenCut2 peroxisomal protein AtPEX13 (At3g07560) (65).…”
Section: Functional Meta-analysis Of Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trypanosomes, a number of proteins involved in import have been characterized, and recent studies have begun to identify processes involved in glycosome turnover and remodeling (5)(6)(7). However, very little is known about organelle biogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peroxisomal import of both PTS1-and PTS2-containing proteins requires a family of proteins, peroxins (PEX), that recognize PTS1 or PTS2 and allow import (46). Several homologues of the PEX proteins have now been identified in trypanosomes and have been shown to be necessary for protein import into the glycosome (47)(48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%