2008
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit

Abstract: In this group of surgical ICU patients, the performance of SAPS 3 was similar to that of APACHE II and SAPS II. Customization improved the calibration of all prognostic models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
89
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
89
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long time, surgical patients were evaluated by the ASA physical status, which gives information on the health status before surgery and, therefore, it is extremely limited to predict the worse evolution and hospital outcome. Sakr Y et al 16 evaluated 1,851 surgical patients in the ICU, in which the majority were Cardiac Surgery patients. In this study, the discriminatory assessment of the SAPS 3 was better than that of the APACHE II and SAPS II, but with poor calibration (probability to estimate mortality correlating with the observed mortality).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a long time, surgical patients were evaluated by the ASA physical status, which gives information on the health status before surgery and, therefore, it is extremely limited to predict the worse evolution and hospital outcome. Sakr Y et al 16 evaluated 1,851 surgical patients in the ICU, in which the majority were Cardiac Surgery patients. In this study, the discriminatory assessment of the SAPS 3 was better than that of the APACHE II and SAPS II, but with poor calibration (probability to estimate mortality correlating with the observed mortality).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Soares and Salluh 13 validated the SAPS 3 in a Brazilian cohort of cancer patients, obtaining good results. Although this prognostic index has been incorporated in several clinical assay protocols in the intensive care environment 14,15 , only one study 16 was developed in surgical ICU patients in Europe, proving to be better than other indexes used before in this population. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the discriminatory power of the SAPS 3 system in a Brazilian population of surgical patients of two tertiary hospitals regarding hospital mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, such scores (e.g., SAPS 3 and APACHE III) have been reported to face the same drawbacks as SAPS II [9,12,38]. Moreover, those scores remain the most widely used scores in practice [39].…”
Section: What Are the Next Steps?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not specifically designed for individual patient care, scoring systems may guide (but will not replace) clinical decision making regarding withdrawal of treatment and/or futility of continued aggressive care. 1,2 However, reliability of a severity score reportedly deteriorates when applied to different populations, probably due to case mix, the level and quality of care, and the development of new treatment options changing overall patient outcomes. 2 Application of a severity scoring system in the intensive care unit with different case mixes raises issues of the system's reliability and validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%