2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10133-010-0045-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the PCR with the Cefoxitin Disc Diffusion Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Oxacillin Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (Cons)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown mostly high sensitivity of PCR up to 97.3% compared to the disk diffusion method [12], Some other studies shows 70.3% [23], While other study gave 59.2% for oxacillin resistant MRSA and 55.2% for cefoxitin resistant MRSA [22,24]. In this study the sensitivity was 55% indicating that the methicillin resistant in S. aureus may not come from mecA gene, it may come from over production of β-lactamase by other gene which have mutation in its regulatory gene, including various length sequences deletion, or conjugation and transformation occur between bacterial cells causing constitutive expression for the β-lactamase [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown mostly high sensitivity of PCR up to 97.3% compared to the disk diffusion method [12], Some other studies shows 70.3% [23], While other study gave 59.2% for oxacillin resistant MRSA and 55.2% for cefoxitin resistant MRSA [22,24]. In this study the sensitivity was 55% indicating that the methicillin resistant in S. aureus may not come from mecA gene, it may come from over production of β-lactamase by other gene which have mutation in its regulatory gene, including various length sequences deletion, or conjugation and transformation occur between bacterial cells causing constitutive expression for the β-lactamase [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%