2001
DOI: 10.1137/s1064827597325463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Nodal Integral Method and Nonstandard Finite-Difference Schemes for the Fisher Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, a rational function approximation to the solution of (3.25) is done. The motivations for presenting this method are the following (i) The numerical methods; finite difference, finite elements ,· · · etc for treating reaction diffusion equations [37,30,38] work with initial-boundary value problems only. Numerical solutions may not be stable for large value of time .…”
Section: Formulation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otherwise, a rational function approximation to the solution of (3.25) is done. The motivations for presenting this method are the following (i) The numerical methods; finite difference, finite elements ,· · · etc for treating reaction diffusion equations [37,30,38] work with initial-boundary value problems only. Numerical solutions may not be stable for large value of time .…”
Section: Formulation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We develop an approach similar to that proposed in [26,27,30,31,28,29] to find approximate analytical solutions to the equations ( 1.1) for the initial value problems (IVP). The approach is based on finding the formal exact solution for the IVP.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our contribution is to consider the dispersion relation through the construction of finite difference schemes. Fortunately, exponentially fitted methods and nonstandard finite differences provide us with a very useful tool: denominators in terms of non-polynomial functions [17,18]. We propose forward time derivative and the second space derivative in (2) to obtain an explicit EF scheme.…”
Section: Pure Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an implicit version of EF finite differences should be used to deal with stiffness. By employing backward time difference in (2), one obtains an implicit version of (17). Local error based parameter selection strategy gives…”
Section: Reaction-diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerical research on Eq. (1), we can refer to works of Al-Khaled [3] by the Sinc collocation method, Uddin [40] using the nodal integral scheme, Chen et al [11] by nonstandard finite difference methods, Dehghan and Fakhar-Izadi [13] using pseudospectral methods, Bastani and Salkuyeh [4] by a sixth-order compact finite difference (CFD6) scheme, Gorder and Vajravelu [23] by a variational technique, Bhrawy [9] by a Jacobi-Gauss-Lobatto collocation method, Li and Ding [28] by a higher order finite difference method and Ramos [34] using exponential methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%