1996
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.7.1846-1848.1996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species

Abstract: API Candida was evaluated in comparison with the ID 32C system for the identification of 619 yeast isolates. The sensitivity of API Candida for the identification of the 15 species it claims to identify with and without additional tests was 97.4% (593 of 609) and 75.2% (458 of 609), respectively. The API Candida system is easy to use and rapid (result in 18 to 24 h).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrated that FTIR spectroscopy presents enough discriminating power to identify C. albicans with great sensitivity. The percentage rates in the present study compare favorably with those obtained by the classical methods of identification, which are based on macro‐ and microscopic examination of fungal cultures and biochemical tests, and which give identification rates >90% for the most frequent species of Candida and dermatophytes . These results are also comparable with those obtained in food yeasts by other research teams using conventional FTIR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…demonstrated that FTIR spectroscopy presents enough discriminating power to identify C. albicans with great sensitivity. The percentage rates in the present study compare favorably with those obtained by the classical methods of identification, which are based on macro‐ and microscopic examination of fungal cultures and biochemical tests, and which give identification rates >90% for the most frequent species of Candida and dermatophytes . These results are also comparable with those obtained in food yeasts by other research teams using conventional FTIR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The conclusion of the authors of this latter study was that although this biotyping method was effective for research applications, it probably would not prove effective for clinical use. In addition to serotyping and the Odds and Abbott biotyping method, a number of other biotyping methods have been used to discriminate C. albicans strains, including morphotyping (145,270,293), resistotyping (144,215), killer yeast typing (278,279), enzyme typing (66,424,425), sugar assimilation typing (50,105,113,120) and drug susceptibility typing (294). Isoenzyme biotyping has also been successfully applied to Candida species (52,180,288).…”
Section: Biotyping Is Inadequate As a Dna Fingerprinting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most isolates used in this study were from a clinical collection. All the strains isolated from C. albicans-infected patients were from our hospital and were confirmed by the Microbiological Research Laboratory, the Center of Health Research and Epidemic Prevention, Shandong Province, using published mycological methods (Baumgartner et al, 1996;Fricker-Hidalgo et al, 1996;Pfaller et al, 1996;National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002). Two azole-susceptible isolates, CA8 and CA14, as well as two azole-resistant isolates, CA10 and CA137, were studied.…”
Section: Organism Reagent and Growth Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%