2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(02)00018-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the mechanical properties of rice husk powder filled polypropylene composites with talc filled polypropylene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
221
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
17
221
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of vegetable reinforcing fillers is widely investigated as such materials are biodegradable and non toxic, have a low-cost on volume basis, lower specific gravity of plastics relative to mineral fillers, and cause less abrasion during processing (Premalal et al 2002;Yang et al 2004). The most often used wood species for production of wood plastic composites (WPCs) are pine, oak and maple (Wolcott and Englund 1999;Ashori and Nourbakhsh 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of vegetable reinforcing fillers is widely investigated as such materials are biodegradable and non toxic, have a low-cost on volume basis, lower specific gravity of plastics relative to mineral fillers, and cause less abrasion during processing (Premalal et al 2002;Yang et al 2004). The most often used wood species for production of wood plastic composites (WPCs) are pine, oak and maple (Wolcott and Englund 1999;Ashori and Nourbakhsh 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypropylene (PP) is one of the most important commercial thermoplastics. It has good mechanical and thermal properties, and low density and low melting temperature (Son et al 2001;Premalal et al 2002;Yang et al 2004;Bledzki and Faruk 2005;Arbelaiz et al 2006;Ashori and Nourbakhsh 2010;Lee et al 2012). However, there is a phase incompatibility between the hydrophobic PP matrix (low surface energy) and the hydrophilic wood flour (high surface energy) (Maldas and Kokta 1993;Kazayawoko et al 1999;Dominkovics et al 2007), with weak interfacial adhesion between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lignocellulosic plastic composites constitute an important set within this kind of materials showing several advantages over traditional mineral-filled plastic composites: low density, low production costs, biodegradability, renewability, etc. Stiffness, hardness and dimensional stability of plastics have also been improved by incorporation of lignocellulosic fillers 1,2 . However, the use of agro-fibers shows some drawbacks such as degradation at relatively low temperature due to the presence of cellulose and hemicellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they have been widely used as reinforcements for thermoplastic composites [2][3][4][5]. The addition of wood flour to neat thermoplastics can greatly stiffen them, but makes them more brittle at the same time [2,6,7]. Compatibilizers such as maleated polyethylene (MAPE) and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) played an important role in improving the compatibility and bonding strength between hydrophilic wood flour and hydrophobic thermoplastics [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%