2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.07.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the MDRD and the CKD-EPI equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in the general population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Finally, in the López-Suárez et al study, the CKD-EPI equation may have overestimated the degree of decrease in kidney function in normoalbuminuric women. 25 In sum, as we have previously alluded to, 3 this literature suggests that the additional contribution of albuminuria and/or eGFR measures may vary based on the population, its diabetes prevalence, and on the outcomes of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Finally, in the López-Suárez et al study, the CKD-EPI equation may have overestimated the degree of decrease in kidney function in normoalbuminuric women. 25 In sum, as we have previously alluded to, 3 this literature suggests that the additional contribution of albuminuria and/or eGFR measures may vary based on the population, its diabetes prevalence, and on the outcomes of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…22,23, 24 In a Spanish study, the prevalence of decreased kidney function was observed to be substantially reduced in participants with diabetes, hypertension, and CVD. 25 Recent studies have shown that the CKD-EPI equation correctly reclassifies people at lower risk of CKD and death into higher eGFR categories. 26,27 Compared with the MDRD Study equation, the CKD-EPI equation suggested lower prevalence of CKD in the KEEP (Kidney Early Evaluation Program) study, a predominantly white population with relatively low prevalence of obesity or diabetes, but similar diabetes prevalence rates associated with CKD across all stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of adults without renal disease, the MDRD equation was more precise and accurate for predicting GFR compared with Cockcroft‐Gault equation, whereas in a study performed in the general population, the CKD‐EPI equation estimated a lower prevalence of renal impairment compared with the MDRD equation . This last result was confirmed in a meta‐analysis comparing CKD‐EPI with MDRD, in which the CKD‐EPI equation classified fewer individuals as having CKD and more accurately categorized the risk for mortality and end‐stage renal disease .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Comparisons of receiver operating characteristic curves were performed by the method of DeLong et al 8 Discrimination and reclassification performance of the 3 equations was evaluated by calculating the integrated discrimination improvement and the net reclassification improvement, as described by Pencina et al 9 We also estimated the clinical usefulness and the net benefit of the 3 equations using the decision curve analysis, according to the methods proposed by Vickers et al 10,11 P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 22.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL), MedCalc, version 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown to be valid in similar populations but may underestimate measured GFR at the higher range leading to misclassification to a lower category and thus over diagnosis of CKD. Thereby, in 2009 a recent adaption for estimating GFR, the CKD-EPI equation, may overcome the limitations of MDRD in earlier stages for screening, detection, and classification of CKD (table 1) [26,27,28,29]. The CKD-EPI equation was developed using data from 8,254 people and validated in a separate data set of 3,896.…”
Section: Detection Of Ckd In Early Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%