Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.2146001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Linear Finite Element Prediction of Deformation and Strain of Human Cancellous Bone to 3D Digital Volume Correlation Measurements

Abstract: The mechanical properties of cancellous bone and the biological response of the tissue to mechanical loading are related to deformation and strain in the trabeculae during function. Due to the small size of trabeculae, their motion is difficult to measure. To avoid the need to measure trabecular motions during loading the finite element method has been used to estimate trabecular level mechanical deformation. This analytical approach has been empirically successful in that the analytical models are solvable an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various mini-mization algorithms have been used for DVC, including Levenberg-Marquardt [5] and BFGS [73], both of which use first derivative information to approximate the Hessian in Newton's method, thereby reducing the cost per iteration. Steepest descent has also been used [28,79], but it converges slowly unless the problem is very well conditioned, so is not recommended in general.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Various mini-mization algorithms have been used for DVC, including Levenberg-Marquardt [5] and BFGS [73], both of which use first derivative information to approximate the Hessian in Newton's method, thereby reducing the cost per iteration. Steepest descent has also been used [28,79], but it converges slowly unless the problem is very well conditioned, so is not recommended in general.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choices include C 0 trilinear interpolation [12,28,42], C 1 tricubic Hermite interpolation [5,73,79], and C 2 tricubic spline interpolation [8,21]. In 2D DIC, C 4 biquintic spline interpolation has also been used [71].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations