1964
DOI: 10.1364/josa.54.000587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Kirchhoff and the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld Theories of Diffraction at an Aperture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that Sommerfeld's diffraction theory integral [e.g., Pearson et al, 1969) used in conjunction with some of Kirchhoff's approximations yields accurate results if the aperture is large in comparison with a wavelength and the diffracted field is observed far from the aperture [Silver, 1962;Wolf and Marchand, 1964;Marchand and Wolf. 1966).…”
Section: Slit Diffraction Method: Theoretical Background and Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that Sommerfeld's diffraction theory integral [e.g., Pearson et al, 1969) used in conjunction with some of Kirchhoff's approximations yields accurate results if the aperture is large in comparison with a wavelength and the diffracted field is observed far from the aperture [Silver, 1962;Wolf and Marchand, 1964;Marchand and Wolf. 1966).…”
Section: Slit Diffraction Method: Theoretical Background and Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rayleigh-Sommerfield integral model has been used for these simulations, together with the piston-transducer approximation. [24] This allows the spatial distribution of the transmitter and detector fields to be determined at a particular frequency, and hence the sensitivity of the transducers to a certain location in 3D space to be determined. As an example, simulation results are shown in Figure 4 for operation at a depth of 5 mm into a polyurethane sample, where the combined sensitivity level of the two probes has been plotted at 300 kHz.…”
Section: Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction formula has been proved to yield exact evaluations of the light fields by methods of Fourier treatment [3][4][5] and gives correct results for both far-field and near-field diffraction. 6,7 Unfortunately, in most cases, these formulas cannot be solved analytically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The DI method computes the diffraction integrals in the spatial domain by means of numerical integration, which can be treated as a linear convolution and can be effectively calculated by means of a FFT and an inverse FFT (IFFT). [13][14][15] Although numerical calculation of both the AS and the DI methods has been discussed extensively in the literature, 4,6,7,[12][13][14][15][16] there is still some confusion to be cleared up. First, the implementation of the diffraction integral by means of convolution and a FFT was not clearly presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%