1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1958.tb03835.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the ‘Iron Absorption Test’ with the Determination of the Iron‐Binding Capacity of Serum in the Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in serum iron expressed as a ratio of the final to the initial concentration was taken as an indicator of iron absorption. 19 Bone marrow was aspirated after sternal puncture in the anaemic patients. Iron content was measured by Perls' Prussian blue.…”
Section: Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in serum iron expressed as a ratio of the final to the initial concentration was taken as an indicator of iron absorption. 19 Bone marrow was aspirated after sternal puncture in the anaemic patients. Iron content was measured by Perls' Prussian blue.…”
Section: Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral iron absorption test (OIAT) was devised some 60 years ago [5][6][7][8][9]. In the first attempt to examine iron absorption, a stable iron radioisotope was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral iron absorption test (OIAT) was introduced more than 30 yr ago to study iron absorption in patients with iron deficiency. Despite the simplicity and safety of the OIAT, this technique has never become popular because of its lack of sensitivity (1)(2)(3). Later, smaller doses were administered and a good correlation between the absorption of iron from different oral doses compared to the more complicated radioisotope technique of whole body counting was demonstrated (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%