2015
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the international normalized ratio levels obtained by portable coagulometer and laboratory in a clinic specializing in oral anticoagulation

Abstract: The use of portable coagulometers was comparable to laboratory tests and better correlation coefficients were observed with CoaguChek XS Plus(®) and in patients with INR lower or within therapeutic range. Portable coagulometers proved to be a useful and reliable tool for INR control in patients using VKA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the correlation was also very strong when the CoaguChek XS Plus was compared with the photo‐optical (Sysmex CS‐2100i/CA‐1500) and the mechanical clot detection methods (Thrombolyzer XRC). Previous studies, that compared the CoaguChek XS Plus with photo‐optical (Sysmex analysers) or mechanical clot detection methods (STAGO analysers), found correlation coefficients approximately 0.95‐0.96; however, the CoaguChek XS Plus had never been compared before with different laboratory techniques simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the correlation was also very strong when the CoaguChek XS Plus was compared with the photo‐optical (Sysmex CS‐2100i/CA‐1500) and the mechanical clot detection methods (Thrombolyzer XRC). Previous studies, that compared the CoaguChek XS Plus with photo‐optical (Sysmex analysers) or mechanical clot detection methods (STAGO analysers), found correlation coefficients approximately 0.95‐0.96; however, the CoaguChek XS Plus had never been compared before with different laboratory techniques simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using whole blood assays is advantageous, as it reduces the sample preparation thus increasing the throughput. Typical test times for these commercial devices is approximately 2-10 min [65,66].…”
Section: Electrical Impedance Dependent Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard plasma-based PT-INR is not a point-of-care method. However, there are several point-of-care whole blood PT methods [22], and some of these can monitor both high and low PTs in warfarin-treated patients [23].…”
Section: Rotem Extem and Ptmentioning
confidence: 99%