2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the influence of nanomaterials on response properties of copper selective electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the increase in potential below pH 2.4 is probably due to the reason that protonation of CLP was promoted at such high acidity, leading to an amount of generated CLP cation. Or electrode membrane may extract H + from the medium at such lower pH and simultaneous response to H + and CLP cation [ 27 , 28 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the increase in potential below pH 2.4 is probably due to the reason that protonation of CLP was promoted at such high acidity, leading to an amount of generated CLP cation. Or electrode membrane may extract H + from the medium at such lower pH and simultaneous response to H + and CLP cation [ 27 , 28 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained electrode was very selective to copper over all interfering ions (log K pot Cu/M ≤ −3) except lead, which was the most interfering ion (logK pot Cd/Pb ≤ −2.1). This was not overly surprising because lead is a well-known interferent in the case of copper selective electrodes [37,38]. The improvement of the selectivity of the nanocomposite-based electrode can be explained by the fact that the addition of the nanocomposite increases the ionic strength of the membrane and thus facilitates the selective transport of the main ion to the membrane phase.…”
Section: Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the electrochemical method of analysis is found to be cheaper and can provide high sensitivity, long-term response stability, and good assay reproducibility for analytes that are amenable to such detection. [12][13][14] It is well documented that azide ions are electrochemically active at carbon, platinum and gold electrodes 1,15 but surprisingly, there have been only a few reports on the electrochemistry of this anion probably due to the high overpotential required for its oxidation. Hence, to decrease the required overpotential for azide oxidation, it is necessary to modify the electrode surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%