2000
DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the In Vitro Holding Strengths of Conical and Cylindrical Pedicle Screws in a Fully Inserted Setting and Backed Out 180°

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
2
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…O desenvolvimento do parafuso com o diâmetro externo cônico foi a tentativa inicial (15) . No entanto, apesar dos bons resultados clínicos com a sua utilização, os parafusos com o desenho externo côni-co podem apresentar propriedades mecânicas inferiores aos parafusos cilíndricos (16) .…”
Section: A B a Bunclassified
“…O desenvolvimento do parafuso com o diâmetro externo cônico foi a tentativa inicial (15) . No entanto, apesar dos bons resultados clínicos com a sua utilização, os parafusos com o desenho externo côni-co podem apresentar propriedades mecânicas inferiores aos parafusos cilíndricos (16) .…”
Section: A B a Bunclassified
“…Similarly, screw pull-out with the calf model reports values from 747 to 7,300 N, depending on treatment (30,35). Polyurethane blocks have been reported in the literature and offer a wealth of data to compare against.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, all samples were toggled and the effects of toggling, hubbing and bone density could not be individually assessed. Lill et al (35) tested screws in calf spines and removed the effect of thicker cortex, as compared to humans, by over-drilling the dorsal cortex to 8 mm diameter and a depth of 2 mm. Although this study did not state the intention to evaluate hubbing, the procedure was very similar.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact of the connection of the implants be internal hexagon, these procedure may have influenced on these superior strength results; and in the densities of 20 and 15 PCF, these conical implants had larger and statistically different results, from that cylindrical implants with external hexagon. Moreover, the conical implants had a smaller diameter than the cylindrical ones, due to the availability of the company; and it can have influenced the values of insertion torque and pullout strength as well as the study of Lill et al 24 , that showed the screws with conical design may present inferior mechanical properties when compared to machine screws in different sizes.…”
Section: Effect Of Implant Design and Bone Density In Primary Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%