2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two commercially available hexavalent vaccines administered as a primary vaccination course at 2, 4 and 6 months of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that the persistence of measurable antibody levels is related to peak anti-HBs levels after immunization [31][32][33]. The increasingly higher prevalence of anti-HBs <10 mIU/ml with time since completed vaccination in Hexavac vaccinees compared to Infanrix hexa vaccinees as suggested by our model is consistent with lower reported anti-HBs levels post-primary vaccination for Hexavac [27]. Similarly, the significantly higher proportion of children vaccinated with Infanrix hexa having anti-HBs levels o1000 mIU/ml within 2 years of the last vaccination compared to those vaccinated with Hexavac implies that Infanrix hexa vaccinees might have responded with substantially higher antiHBs levels post-vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have shown that the persistence of measurable antibody levels is related to peak anti-HBs levels after immunization [31][32][33]. The increasingly higher prevalence of anti-HBs <10 mIU/ml with time since completed vaccination in Hexavac vaccinees compared to Infanrix hexa vaccinees as suggested by our model is consistent with lower reported anti-HBs levels post-primary vaccination for Hexavac [27]. Similarly, the significantly higher proportion of children vaccinated with Infanrix hexa having anti-HBs levels o1000 mIU/ml within 2 years of the last vaccination compared to those vaccinated with Hexavac implies that Infanrix hexa vaccinees might have responded with substantially higher antiHBs levels post-vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, another recent Italian study in children attending local health units found that 31 % of 113 Hexavac vaccinees had anti-HBs <10 mIU/ml compared to only 4 % of 129 Infanrix hexa vaccinees 15 months post-primary vaccination with three doses [35]. A clinical trial showed that both the proportion of children with anti-HBs o10 mIU/ml as well as geometric mean titres (GMTs) were significantly higher in children vaccinated with three doses of Infanrix hexa compared to three doses of Hexavac 1 month post-vaccination [27]. A follow-up trial reported significantly higher anti-HBs GMTs as well as seroprevalence rates at age 11-23 months in infants primed with Infanrix hexa in the first study [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, anti-FHA responses were 300.3 EU/mL and 302.8 EU/mL (GMT) and 99.0% and 99.1% (≥4-fold rise) for these two DTaP vaccines, respectively. 25 …”
Section: Immunogenicity Comparison Versus Other Licensed Dtap Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 We report two serological follow up studies conducted in Germany in healthy children between 4 and 9 years of age who had been previously primed and boosted with four doses of combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine in previous GSK-sponsored clinical trials. 3,[5][6][7][8][9] The immune response to a challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine in these subjects was also assessed and has been reported elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%