1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1989.tb00227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the in vitro characteristics of von Willebrand factor in British and commercial factor VIII concentrates

Abstract: Qualitative/quantitative analysis of von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf:Ag) in either heat or solvent/detergent treated factor VIII concentrates, used for haemophilia replacement therapy, was undertaken to assess their suitability for the treatment of vWD. For the first time immunoaffinity purified vWf:Ag (Monoclate by-product) was also evaluated by in vitro assessment. Potencies of vWf:Ag varied considerably but were consistently higher (28.9-420.5 iu/ml) than factor VIII:C (one-stage) activity (8.13-42.44 iu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, not all intermediate-purity factor VIII products possessed significant (greater than 50%) protease activity. The heterogeneous nature of factor VIII concentrates has long been recognized (Lawrie et al, 1989), and it is accepted that this has a profound effect on the efficacy of factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of von Willebrand's disease (Pasi et al, 1990;Mannucci et al, 1992). Presumably, a similar phenomenon is at play here and reflects methodological differences in manufacturing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, not all intermediate-purity factor VIII products possessed significant (greater than 50%) protease activity. The heterogeneous nature of factor VIII concentrates has long been recognized (Lawrie et al, 1989), and it is accepted that this has a profound effect on the efficacy of factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of von Willebrand's disease (Pasi et al, 1990;Mannucci et al, 1992). Presumably, a similar phenomenon is at play here and reflects methodological differences in manufacturing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For collagen binding experiments, microtiter wells were coated with 50 l of either a suspension of collagen type I (50 g/ml) or of BSA (5 mg/ml) in 67 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, by incubation at 37°C overnight (27). For decorin binding experiments, microtiter wells were coated with 50 l of either decorin (10 g/ml) or BSA (5 mg/ml) in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline by incubation at 37°C overnight.…”
Section: Materials-[12-3 H]cholesteryl Linoleate T-butoxycarbonyl-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation and Modification of Lipoproteins-Human LDL (d ϭ 1.019 -1.050 g/ml) and HDL 3 (d ϭ 1.125-1.210 g/ml) were isolated from plasma of healthy volunteers by sequential ultracentrifugation (23 Adsorption of Proteins to Microtiter Wells-A suspension of collagen was obtained by dissolving 1 mg/ml collagen type I in 0.1 M acetic acid followed by dialysis against 67 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, for 2-3 days at 4°C (27). For collagen binding experiments, microtiter wells were coated with 50 l of either a suspension of collagen type I (50 g/ml) or of BSA (5 mg/ml) in 67 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, by incubation at 37°C overnight (27).…”
Section: Materials-[12-3 H]cholesteryl Linoleate T-butoxycarbonyl-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay was performed essentially as previously described by Lawrie et al (35). Briefly, calf skin collagen type I (Sigma Chemical Co.) was dissolved in 0.1 M acetic acid and dialyzed overnight at 4°C against 67 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2.…”
Section: Binding Ofvwfto Collagenmentioning
confidence: 99%