1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(96)00093-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the heavy metal sorptive properties of three types of immobilized, non-viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The immobilization process of algae is the same as that used in [17,18]. Where 70 g of the washed algae suspended in distilled water at 50% w/v.…”
Section: Procedures For Immobilization Of Algaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immobilization process of algae is the same as that used in [17,18]. Where 70 g of the washed algae suspended in distilled water at 50% w/v.…”
Section: Procedures For Immobilization Of Algaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomass was immobilised using polyethyleneimine (50% aqueous polyethyleneimine, SigmaAldrich, Germany) and glutaraldehyde (50% aqueous glutaraldehyde, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) as embedding and crosslinking agents, respectively, and subsequently treated with hot alkali (3% potassium hydroxide) solution according to the method described by Stoll & Duncan (1997).…”
Section: Biosorbent Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeast biomass (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) was immobilised using polyethyleneimine (PEI) and gluteraldehyde (GA) as embedding and cross-linking agents, respectively; they were subsequently treated with hot alkali solution 11 (3% potassium hydroxide (KOH), Merck Chemicals, South Africa). Forty grams (wet weight) of yeast was mixed with 4 ml distilled water to form a smooth paste.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy With Energy-dispersive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%