The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb09848.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of adenosine monophosphate with sodium nitroprusside in a canine model of acute global left ventricular dysfunction

Abstract: 1The haemodynamic effects of adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were compared in anaesthetized dogs following the induction of acute left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. 2 LV dysfunction was induced by the intracoronary administration of glass microbeads until left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was increased from 5 to 15 mmHg. This was associated with a decrease in LV dP/dt and cardiac index (CI) of 30% and 27%, respectively, and an increase in systemic vascular resistan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown previously (Finegan et al, 1990), in normal anaesthetized dogs, that afterload reduction due to Ado receptormediated vasodilatation, increases cardiac output more than equieffective afterload reducing doses of sodium nitroprusside (SNP). A similar result was also observed in a canine model of acute left ventricular dysfunction (Finegan & Clanachan, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We have shown previously (Finegan et al, 1990), in normal anaesthetized dogs, that afterload reduction due to Ado receptormediated vasodilatation, increases cardiac output more than equieffective afterload reducing doses of sodium nitroprusside (SNP). A similar result was also observed in a canine model of acute left ventricular dysfunction (Finegan & Clanachan, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%