2016
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, and Berg Balance Scale to Predict Falls in Parkinson Disease

Abstract: The FAB scale, Mini-BESTest, and BBS provide moderate capacity to predict "fallers" (people with one or more falls) from "nonfallers." Only some items of the 3 scales contribute to the detection of future falls. Clinicians should particularly focus on the item "tandem stance" along with the items "one-leg stance," "rise to toes," "compensatory stepping backward," "turning 360°," and "placing foot on stool" when analyzing postural control deficits related to fall risk. Future research should analyze whether bal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
55
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, using various scales, balance problems could be easily checked in PD patients, and it is possible to predict falls with these scales 30 . Therefore, balance function is crucial to avoiding falls, and prevention strategies focusing on postural instability, such as balance rehabilitation, could reduce falls in PD patients 31, 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, using various scales, balance problems could be easily checked in PD patients, and it is possible to predict falls with these scales 30 . Therefore, balance function is crucial to avoiding falls, and prevention strategies focusing on postural instability, such as balance rehabilitation, could reduce falls in PD patients 31, 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a recommended cut score of 20/32 points, the BEST test accurately predicted falls in PD during a 6‐month period (area under curve = 0.87, sensitivity = 0.86, specificity = 0.78) . There was no evidence of ceiling or floor effects, and a normal distribution of scores was observed in PD . An informative, web‐based training is available for these tests.…”
Section: Assessing Risk and Classifying Falls: From Technology To CLImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 There was no evidence of ceiling or floor effects, and a normal distribution of scores was observed in PD. 49 An informative, webbased training is available for these tests. Another advantage of the BEST and mini-BEST is that both identify specific domains where deficits occur, identifying targets for therapy.…”
Section: Classification Of Fallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each assignment's score is 0-4, with 0 indicating inability to fulfill the balance assignment and 4 showing the subjects' ability to accomplish the task ideally and totally independently. The total score is calculated by summing up the scores of the ten sections [22,23]. A test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.96 and an interrater reliability of 0.94-0.97 were also calculated for this tool [22][23][24].…”
Section: The Fullerton Advanced Balance (Fab) Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score is calculated by summing up the scores of the ten sections [22,23]. A test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.96 and an interrater reliability of 0.94-0.97 were also calculated for this tool [22][23][24].…”
Section: The Fullerton Advanced Balance (Fab) Scalementioning
confidence: 99%