2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(01)00098-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the fisk magnetic field with the standard parker IMF: consequences for diffusion coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where tan É ¼ ÀB / B 2 r þ B 2 À Á 1/2 and tan ¼ B /B r . Note that Alania & Dzhapiashvili (1979), Alania (2002), and Kobylinski (2001) give a similar result, but with tan É ¼ ÀB /B r . The relevant angles are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Fisk-parker Hybridmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where tan É ¼ ÀB / B 2 r þ B 2 À Á 1/2 and tan ¼ B /B r . Note that Alania & Dzhapiashvili (1979), Alania (2002), and Kobylinski (2001) give a similar result, but with tan É ¼ ÀB /B r . The relevant angles are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Fisk-parker Hybridmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Between this latitude and the one labeled II in the figure, one would expect a mixture of a region where footpoint motion occurs by means of diffusive reconnection, and another by means of ordered motion. The former leads to a Parker-type field, and the latter to a Fisk-type field ( Kobylinski 2001). At lower latitudes than the one labeled III, the field will be Parker-like.…”
Section: The Fisk-parker Hybrid Field: a Solar-cycle Dependent Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…formation from field-aligned to spherical coordinates (Alania & Dzhapiashvili 1979;Kobylinski 2001) yields the tensor used in equation 4.…”
Section: Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was able to derive analytical expressions that generalize the Parker field correspondingly. Subsequent analytical investigations [Zurbuchen et al, 1997;Kobylinski, 2001;Schwadron, 2002;Schwadron et al, 2008] have quantified the complex structure of this so-called Fisk-field and its deviations from the Parker field, and numerical simulations have revealed that the original choice of parameters by Fisk [1996] represented an extreme, which has recently been confirmed via a study of the consequences of the Fisk-field for cosmic ray modulation [Sternal et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%