AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-7083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Extended and Unscented Kalman Filters for Angles Based Relative Navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These claims, however, are provided without any theoretical or empirical justification. Stastny et al found that using the Cholesky decomposition method caused divergence; therefore, they used the Schur method instead [22]. Some authors using the UKF do not explicitly state which matrix square root operation was used [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These claims, however, are provided without any theoretical or empirical justification. Stastny et al found that using the Cholesky decomposition method caused divergence; therefore, they used the Schur method instead [22]. Some authors using the UKF do not explicitly state which matrix square root operation was used [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, K is the Kalman gain matrix, which is calculated from the equations of a nonlinear Kalman filter. A common simplification used in many applications [12,17,29,30] is that the process and measurement noise are additive [31], as in…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kandepu et al [11] presented the same conclusions through four different simulation studies of the following problems: Van der Pol oscillator, estimation in an induction machine, state estimation of a reversible reaction, and a solid oxide fuel cell combined gas turbine hybrid system. Stastny et al [12], Akin et al [13], Chowdhary and Jategaonkar [14], Giannitrapani et al [15], and Kim et al [16] concluded that the UKF achieves slightly better performance than the EKF within applications of angles-based navigation, state estimation of induction motors, aerodynamic parameter estimation, spacecraft localization using angle measurements, and spiraling ballistic missile state estimation, respectively. Saulson and Chang [17] and LaViola [18] found insignificant differences in the performance between the EKF and UKF for the ballistic missile tracking problem and for estimation of quaternion motion for human tracking, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, other researchers found that the UKF only outperformed the EKF for GPS/INS sensor fusion under large initialization errors [9,[31][32][33]. Slight performance advantage of the UKF over the EKF was reported for angles-based navigation [34], GPS/INS position estimation [35], state estimation of induction motors [36], and aerodynamic parameter estimation [37]. Some studies of the problems of aircraft attitude estimation [6,8], ballistic missile tracking [38] and quaternion motion for human tracking [39] found insignificant differences in EKF and UKF performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%