2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.245104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the electronic structure of the Hubbard andtJmodels within the cluster perturbation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More detailed analysis is planned in future work. Note that the similar effect has been recently observed for the temperature and doping evolution of the band structure in the Hubbard model [58,59]. When the chemical potential enters into the flat band and the quantum phase transition is observed, the density of states raises sharply [Fig.…”
Section: Polaron Band Structuresupporting
confidence: 74%
“…More detailed analysis is planned in future work. Note that the similar effect has been recently observed for the temperature and doping evolution of the band structure in the Hubbard model [58,59]. When the chemical potential enters into the flat band and the quantum phase transition is observed, the density of states raises sharply [Fig.…”
Section: Polaron Band Structuresupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore it turns out that the translational symmetry break- ing does not seem to affect the structure of the FS in this "pure" PG regime. This statement is supported by a number of numerical calculations carried out in the framework of cluster approaches (CPT [47][48][49], C-DMFT [44,50,51]) for the different cluster sizes, whith the resulting FSs qualitatively corresponding to the FS arcs obtained in the present work.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…This automatically results in an inhomogeneous distribution of the electron density within the isolated cluster. (Note, however, that the smallest possible 2 × 2 cluster does not result in such an induced CDW order [16]). This is not the case, however.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%