2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficiency of nail pick and brush used for nail cleaning during surgical scrub on reducing bacterial counts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is preferable that sinks have electronic sensor controls or be operated by the knee or foot 14 . In addition, the evidence indicates that surgical hand scrubs should not be performed using a brush, because scrubbing with a brush may damage skin and increase bacterial shedding from the hands 3,4,24‐26 …”
Section: Key Takeaways Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is preferable that sinks have electronic sensor controls or be operated by the knee or foot 14 . In addition, the evidence indicates that surgical hand scrubs should not be performed using a brush, because scrubbing with a brush may damage skin and increase bacterial shedding from the hands 3,4,24‐26 …”
Section: Key Takeaways Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques involving brushes and scrubbing cause small excoriations, consequently damage the skin, and increase the risk of skin colonisation by pathogenic bacteria species without providing any additional effect on instant bacterial reduction (Larson et al . ; Okgün Alcan and Demir Korkmaz ). If hands are visibly soiled and surgical scrub is to be carried out, current recommendations are to use a soft sponge for forearms and hands, and a soft brush for the fingertips, if any aids are to be used (WHO ).…”
Section: Evidence‐based History: Cleaning Hands Saves Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the relatively high number of hand hygiene procedures that healthcare staff are subjected to perform on a daily basis, hand washing can more quickly result in dermatitis and subsequent increased skin colonisation by pathogenic bacterial species (Larson et al . ; Okgün Alcan and Demir Korkmaz ). Emphasis on maintaining the intactness and moisture of the skin is therefore crucial for the efficacy aspect, but probably even more for compliance to hand hygiene acts.…”
Section: Evidence‐based History: Cleaning Hands Saves Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H and hygiene forms the basis of antiseptic techniques aimed at reducing the incidence of nosocomial and surgical site infections. [1][2][3] The contaminated hands of health workers are known to result in nosocomial and surgical site infections. These infections lead to severe morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These infections lead to severe morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs. [1][2][3][4] Surgical hand washing has an important place in preventing the development and transfer of nosocomial infections, and also in the development of surgical site infections. [2,4] Cleaning of hand and arms with an antiseptic solution was first initiated in the 1860s by Joseph Lister' s surgical team, which used carbonic acid for hand disinfection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%