2003
DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.suppl_2.ii13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy of the tumour necrosis factor   blocking agents adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab when added to methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
89
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, when comparing the results of the study by Tugwell et al (CSA added to preexisting MTX treatment in a step-up design) (11) with those of the study by Gerards et al (CSA monotherapy compared with CSA plus MTX in a parallel design) (31), the clinical response to CSA monotherapy and to CSA step-up treatment were virtually identical (Table 1). Rheumatologists (in contrast to other subspecialists, such as oncologists) tend to avoid comparing arms from different trials and miss important information that is possible to obtain relatively objectively (32). Thus, with all the limitations of such between-trials comparisons, the data reviewed above imply that the combination of these agents may not be superior to monotherapy.…”
Section: Study Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when comparing the results of the study by Tugwell et al (CSA added to preexisting MTX treatment in a step-up design) (11) with those of the study by Gerards et al (CSA monotherapy compared with CSA plus MTX in a parallel design) (31), the clinical response to CSA monotherapy and to CSA step-up treatment were virtually identical (Table 1). Rheumatologists (in contrast to other subspecialists, such as oncologists) tend to avoid comparing arms from different trials and miss important information that is possible to obtain relatively objectively (32). Thus, with all the limitations of such between-trials comparisons, the data reviewed above imply that the combination of these agents may not be superior to monotherapy.…”
Section: Study Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). In contrast, S4B6 slightly inhibited BrdU incorporation by CD4 ϩ T cells and had no significant effect on the Foxp3 ϩ subpopulation of CD4 ϩ T cells (regulatory T cells (Tregs) 3 ; Fig. 1B).…”
Section: S4b6 Selectively Increases Cd8 ϩ T Cell Proliferation In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This did not seem to be accomplished by decreasing urinary excretion of IL-2, because S4B6 administration actually increased the IL-2 content of urine excreted during the 24 h subsequent to IL-2 injection. We 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg, regulatory T cell; FcRn, neonatal Fc receptor.…”
Section: S4b6 Promotes Il-2 Agonist Effects By Increasing Il-2 Half-lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, infliximab (Remicade, Centocor, Horsham, PA) is a chimeric IgG1 mAb that binds and inhibits soluble as well as membrane-bound TNF-␣. The efficacy of both treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis seems to be comparable (36), but in patients with Crohn's disease, etanercept, in contrast to infliximab, seems not to be effective (37). The role of adalimumab (Humira, Abbott, Chicago, IL), a novel, fully human TNF-␣-inhibiting mAb (38) that has been shown to be effective in rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease when the response to etanercept or infliximab is lost (39,40), in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis remains to be established.…”
Section: Tnf-␣ Inhibition: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%