2016
DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2016.1232776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy of denosumab and bisphosphonates for treating secondary osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: Neither denosumab nor bisphosphonates could suppress inflammation or RA disease activity, but denosumab significantly suppressed a marker of bone metabolism in Japanese RA patients never previously treated for osteoporosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the use of denosumab seems neither related to a higher risk for inflammatory activity (relapse of IBD), nor for an increased risk for infectious diseases [79]. This has been subject of study in rheumatoid arthritis but not in IBD [80], and effects on bone formation more than on bone resorption have been proposed when observing elevated concentrations of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [81]. In addition, denosumab use seems to be associated with a rebound effect following discontinuation of therapy which may be considered to be a major flaw when using this drug in the relative young IBD population [82].…”
Section: Denosumab and Other New Bone Health-improving Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the use of denosumab seems neither related to a higher risk for inflammatory activity (relapse of IBD), nor for an increased risk for infectious diseases [79]. This has been subject of study in rheumatoid arthritis but not in IBD [80], and effects on bone formation more than on bone resorption have been proposed when observing elevated concentrations of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [81]. In addition, denosumab use seems to be associated with a rebound effect following discontinuation of therapy which may be considered to be a major flaw when using this drug in the relative young IBD population [82].…”
Section: Denosumab and Other New Bone Health-improving Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DMab, but not bisphosphonates, significantly suppressed bone metabolism in a cohort of Japanese RA patients not previously treated for osteoporosis. These findings suggest distinct cellular mechanisms underlying DMab- and bisphosphonate-based RA therapy (4, 58). DMab exerts its protective effects likely through the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway via regulating DKK-1 (25, 59).…”
Section: Denosumab - Current Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Findings from these studies suggest that bisphosphonates accumulate in bone but the effect on resorption is not well understood (54). Distinct cellular distribution and action could explain the difference in the degree, speed and action of anti-resorptive effects between DMab and bisphosphonate (18, 31, 58). In contrast to bisphosphonate, DMab significantly reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at 6 and 12 months compared with pretreatment, but had no effect on tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels, emphasizing the effect of DMab more on bone formation than resorption rate(58).…”
Section: Denosumab - Current Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations