2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-007-0005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy of clinical examination, ultrasound neck and computed tomography in detection and staging of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well recognized that the presence of cervical metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, accounting for a 50% reduction in the five-year survival rate for ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis [30][31][32] and 75% reduction in case of bilateral metastasis [33,34]. When the risk of metastasis exceeds 15-20%, neck dissection or radiation therapy is indicated [35,36]. Most tumours have a predictable pattern of neck metastasis.…”
Section: Lymph Node Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that the presence of cervical metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, accounting for a 50% reduction in the five-year survival rate for ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis [30][31][32] and 75% reduction in case of bilateral metastasis [33,34]. When the risk of metastasis exceeds 15-20%, neck dissection or radiation therapy is indicated [35,36]. Most tumours have a predictable pattern of neck metastasis.…”
Section: Lymph Node Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical palpation of cervical lymph nodes has many false negative and false positive results [5,6]. It was said to be existed in 20 -40% of cases [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study were in accordance with those reported by Millesi et al [28] and Hodder et al [29], who found values over 90 %. Other authors obtained different results; Haberal et al [30] and Anand et al [31] found rates over 70 %, but Hohlweg-Majert et al [32] described a sensitivity of 24.5 % for US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%