1994
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199400234-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trandolapril and Nifedipine SR in Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 In non-placebo-controlled studies, the rates of edema with dihydropyridine CCBs ranged from 5% to 28% with nifedipine, [25][26][27][28][29] 2% to 32% with amlodipine, 29 -34 0% to 30% with felodipine, 24,26,30,[35][36][37][38][39] 8% to 14% with isradipine, 37,40 8% to 15% with nicardipine, 41 19% with nisoldipine, 42 6% with lacdipine, 43 and 5% to 17% with nitrendipine. 44,45 Two non-placebocontrolled studies, one using nifedipine and the other isradipine, did not report edema as an adverse event.…”
Section: Calcium Channel Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 In non-placebo-controlled studies, the rates of edema with dihydropyridine CCBs ranged from 5% to 28% with nifedipine, [25][26][27][28][29] 2% to 32% with amlodipine, 29 -34 0% to 30% with felodipine, 24,26,30,[35][36][37][38][39] 8% to 14% with isradipine, 37,40 8% to 15% with nicardipine, 41 19% with nisoldipine, 42 6% with lacdipine, 43 and 5% to 17% with nitrendipine. 44,45 Two non-placebocontrolled studies, one using nifedipine and the other isradipine, did not report edema as an adverse event.…”
Section: Calcium Channel Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%