2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5809081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Conbercept with Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Introduction. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) versus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. Relevant studies were identified through systemic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, CNKI, and Wanfang database up to 28 February 2019. Changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) in μm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR equivalents at 1, 3, and 6 months after initial treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several systematic reviews of IVC have been published (Zhang et al, 2018a;Cui and Lu, 2018;, 2018; Liu and Li, 2019;Sun et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020), their limitations and biases were considered uncontrollable, which could result in unreliability of the conclusions. Thus, all studies included in these reviews had been rechecked thoroughly (Supplementary Table S6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although several systematic reviews of IVC have been published (Zhang et al, 2018a;Cui and Lu, 2018;, 2018; Liu and Li, 2019;Sun et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020), their limitations and biases were considered uncontrollable, which could result in unreliability of the conclusions. Thus, all studies included in these reviews had been rechecked thoroughly (Supplementary Table S6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several attempts on the efficacy and safety of conbercept have been published (Zhang et al, 2018a;Cui and Lu, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Liu and Li, 2019;Sun et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020), no study has pooled up-to-date data and comprehensively summarized the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used conbercept for the treatment of nAMD, DME, and pmCNV. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether conbercept, compared with other therapeutic regimens, is more beneficial for patients with nAMD, DME, and pmCNV in terms of efficacy, safety, compliance, and pharmacoeconomic evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a meta-analysis, which included 588 patients, compared the effect and safety of conbercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of DME suggested that intravitreal injections of conbercept were superior to ranibizumab in both reducing CRT and improving BCVA [ 93 ]. Regarding safety, the pooled results showed that there was no significant difference in the risk of intraocular pressure increase (or conjunctival hemorrhage between two groups [ 93 ].vd…”
Section: Treatment Strategies Of Dmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Safety . The most frequently reported ocular adverse event was conjunctival hemorrhage [ 88 93 ]. The incidence and type of adverse events did not significantly differ from those previously reported for other anti-VEGF therapies (Sections 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 ).…”
Section: Treatment Strategies Of Dmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis comparing the efficacies of conbercept and ranibizumab for DME treatment demonstrated that intravitreal conbercept was significantly superior to ranibizumab in reducing CMT; however, no significant difference in visual improvement was observed [42]. The effects and safety of conbercept and ranibizumab in DME treatment were also compared in a recent meta-analysis by Sun et al, and the results demonstrated that intravitreal injections of conbercept were superior to ranibizumab in both reducing central retinal thickness and improving BCVA [43].…”
Section: Diabetic Macular Edemamentioning
confidence: 99%