2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03245-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between a low-fluence 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and a conventional Q-switched 532-nm laser for the treatment of cafe-au-lait macules in 40 Chinese children: a prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled, evaluator-blinded trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The uneven pigmentation rate in our study was higher on the conventional HFQS 755‐nm laser‐treated side than on the other side, indicating that the LFQS 1064‐nm laser is more appropriate for an even and gradual change in lesion appearance. Our uneven pigmentation rate was higher than previous study (9.5%, 2/21) of Zhang's 11 . That may be because Zhang used conventional QS 532‐nm laser with larger spot, lower fluence which can make the lesion color even.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The uneven pigmentation rate in our study was higher on the conventional HFQS 755‐nm laser‐treated side than on the other side, indicating that the LFQS 1064‐nm laser is more appropriate for an even and gradual change in lesion appearance. Our uneven pigmentation rate was higher than previous study (9.5%, 2/21) of Zhang's 11 . That may be because Zhang used conventional QS 532‐nm laser with larger spot, lower fluence which can make the lesion color even.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…17 Several studies have reported the use of the LFQS 1064-nm laser in the treatment of CALMs with good results and low side effects (Supporting Information: Table 2). [8][9][10][11][12] This prospective, self-controlled study confirmed that the overall effectiveness of LFQS 1064-nm laser and conventional HFQS 755-nm laser in the treatment of CALMs within 3 months were not significantly different. But 11 lesions treated with LFQS 1064-nm laser and 7 treated with HFQS 755-nm laser were included in the Tertile 3 group (3.67 ≤ VAS ≤ 4), suggesting that within 3 months, the LFQS 1064-nm laser may help more patients achieve the top-third of efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations