2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1760-2734(06)70053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effects of imidapril and enalapril in a prospective, multicentric randomized trial in dogs with naturally acquired heart failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these studies were prospective, placebo-controlled (except the FIRST study [17] which compared imidapril to enalapril), double-blinded, multicentric, and randomized. The initial studies were shortterm clinical trials with treatment lasting 3 to 4 weeks [18,19].…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All these studies were prospective, placebo-controlled (except the FIRST study [17] which compared imidapril to enalapril), double-blinded, multicentric, and randomized. The initial studies were shortterm clinical trials with treatment lasting 3 to 4 weeks [18,19].…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, the clinical endpoints were clinical variables. The subsequent trials were long-term studies for assessing survival times [17,20,21,22].…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations