1971
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0260065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Effects of Cyproterone, Cyproterone Acetate and Oestradiol on Testicular Function, Accessory Sexual Glands and Fertility in a Long-Term Study on Rats

Abstract: Treatment of adult male rats with oestradiol, cyproterone acetate or cyproterone affected spermatogenesis, accessory sexual glands and fertility in different ways. Suppression of Leydig cells, spermatogenesis, accessory sexual glands and fertility ran parallel in oestradiol-treated animals. High doses of cyproterone acetate caused severe suppression of the accessory sexual glands and fertility but had only a slight inhibitory influence on spermatogenesis, Leydig cells were only temporarily affected. With high … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyproterone acetate is also known to inhibit the formation of the nuclear androgen receptor complex and the retention of DHT in the male accessory sex glands of rodents [Geller et al, 1968;Liao, 1969, 1971;Walsh and Korenman, 1970;Belham and Neal, 1971;Stern and Eisenfeld, 1969], It also abolishes the effect of testosterone proprionate, androstenedione. DHEA, ACTH and prolactin on the rat prostate [Neumann et al, 1970], Other effects of cyp roterone acetate include the displacement of androgen from their specific cytosol receptor and the inhibition of steroid synthesis by the Leydig cells [Neumann et al, 1966;Hoffmann and Brener, 1968;Steinbeck, et al, 1971;Grant and Stitch, 1973;Neumann and Steinbeck, 1974]. Little is known about the fate of the cytosol receptor-antiandrogen complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyproterone acetate is also known to inhibit the formation of the nuclear androgen receptor complex and the retention of DHT in the male accessory sex glands of rodents [Geller et al, 1968;Liao, 1969, 1971;Walsh and Korenman, 1970;Belham and Neal, 1971;Stern and Eisenfeld, 1969], It also abolishes the effect of testosterone proprionate, androstenedione. DHEA, ACTH and prolactin on the rat prostate [Neumann et al, 1970], Other effects of cyp roterone acetate include the displacement of androgen from their specific cytosol receptor and the inhibition of steroid synthesis by the Leydig cells [Neumann et al, 1966;Hoffmann and Brener, 1968;Steinbeck, et al, 1971;Grant and Stitch, 1973;Neumann and Steinbeck, 1974]. Little is known about the fate of the cytosol receptor-antiandrogen complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steinbeck et al [26] have expressed strong reservations against the use of cyproterone acetate as a contraceptive agent for men. These observations are based primarily on studies of W h a len and Lu t t g e [33], Steinbeck et al [26] and of other earlier studies by N eu m a n n et al [16] who used very high doses of cyproterone acetate.…”
Section: A New Approach To Control O F Fertility In the Malementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are based primarily on studies of W h a len and Lu t t g e [33], Steinbeck et al [26] and of other earlier studies by N eu m a n n et al [16] who used very high doses of cyproterone acetate. It is clear that such antifertility effects reported by W halen and L u t t g e [33] in which the accessory glands were atrophic and spermatogenesis was partially impaired, would be unacceptable for use in men.…”
Section: A New Approach To Control O F Fertility In the Malementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precise mechanism whereby antiandrogens such as cyproterone and cyproterone acetate inhibit androgen activity both peripherally and centrally and the overall effects produced in vivo by the drugs have evoked numerous studies (Stern & Eisenfeld, 1969; Singh & Rajalakshmi, 1970;Steinbeck, Mehring & Neumann, 1971;Walsh, Swerdloff & Odell, 1972;Hasan, Neumann & Schenck, 1973;Neumann & Steinbeck, 1975; Schenck, Elger, Schopflin & Neumann, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%