2005
DOI: 10.1253/circj.69.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Effects of a Distal Embolic Protection Device and an Aspiration Catheter During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a protective device during stenting will prevent distal embolism. 26,27 Although not significantly different, the incidence of ADR in our study was slightly higher with ticlopidine, but none was serious. Because a patient on ticlopidine developed TTP prior to this study, all patients on antiplatelet therapy are monitored by laboratory studies every 2 weeks to minimize the possible development of ADR.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Using a protective device during stenting will prevent distal embolism. 26,27 Although not significantly different, the incidence of ADR in our study was slightly higher with ticlopidine, but none was serious. Because a patient on ticlopidine developed TTP prior to this study, all patients on antiplatelet therapy are monitored by laboratory studies every 2 weeks to minimize the possible development of ADR.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…16 Recently, Taguchi et al also reported that using a distal protection device is superior to the aspiration method for distal embolization after PCI with stenting for AMI. 17 In our study, the post-PCI TMP grades were more favorable in group A than in B. TMP grade 3 was more common in group A, and in 49 selected patients with TIMI grade 3 flow, TMP grade 3 was also more common in group A. These results suggest that a distal protection device is effective in the recovery of reperfusion at the myocardial tissue level, which may be effective in preserving the microvascular integrity of the myocardium during primary PCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that a distal embolization protection device may be a safe and effective tool in preserving the microvasculature of the myocardium during primary PCI in AMI. [14][15][16][17][18] The coronary angiographic Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade (TMP) 19,20 and phasic coronary flow velocity patterns, as assessed by an intracoronary Doppler wire after primary PCI, both of which represent the myocardial reperfusion status and microvascular integrity of the IRA, are related to functional improvement of the left ventricle and prognosis of the patient. 21,22 Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the PercuSurge GuardWire ® system in preserving the microvascular integrity of the myocardium during primary PCI in AMI patients, using the intracoronary Doppler wire to measure coronary flow velocities and phasic coronary flow velocity patterns of the IRA following primary PCI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, distal protection devices have been reported to be effective in preventing reperfusion injury and no-reflow phenomenon. 27,28 However, in the Enhanced Myocardial Efficacy and Recovery by Aspiration of Liberated Debris (EMERALD) trial, distal embolic protection did not result in improved microvascular flow, greater reperfusion success, reduced infarct size, or enhanced event-free survival. 29 Since the relative CT number and coronary microcirculatory variables were significantly correlated with the infract size in the present study, the broad intramyocardial hemorrhage and/ or expansion of the left ventricular lumen itself might impair the coronary microvascular reflow just after epicardial coronary revascularization in acute MI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%