Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic and open hysterectomy on surgical site wound infections in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta‐analysis

Abstract

This meta‐analysis aimed to compare laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and open hysterectomy (OH) in terms of surgical site wound infection, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched for studies on OH and LH for EC published between 2008 and July 2023, in any language. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included case–control studies was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Data were collated and analysed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 1245 articles were screened according to the search strategy, and ultimately 15 studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with a total of 1606 patients with EC, of which 751 were treated with LH and 855 with OH. The results showed that the rate of postoperative wound infection was significantly higher (OR: 0.290; 95% CI: 0.169–0.496, p < 0.001), the length of hospital stay was significantly longer (SMD: −1.976, 95% CI: −2.669 to −1.283, p < 0.001), and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher (OR: 0.366; 95% CI: 0.280–0.478, p < 0.001) in the OH group than in the LH group. This study showed that LH was superior to OH for the treatment of EC and is associated with a lower rate of wound infection, shorter length of hospitalisation, and a reduced risk of complications. Thus, our findings support the choice of LH over OH for EC.