Comparison of the Effects of Deramciclane, Ritanserin and Buspirone on Extracellular Dopamine and Its Metabolites in Striatum and Nucleus Accumbens of Freely Moving Rats
Abstract:Abstract:In the present study, we assessed the effect of single graded doses of a putative anxiolytic compound, the 5-HT 2A/C antagonist, deramciclane fumarate (EGIS-3886), on the dopamine efflux and metabolism in nucleus accumbens and striatum and thus evaluated the dose window for deramciclane to cause adverse effects related to the brain dopaminergic system. Dual probe in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats was used to compare the effects of graded doses of deramciclane fumarate (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), 5… Show more
“…The tissue samples were frozen and stored at −70° C until being analyzed. DA levels in both striata were analyzed by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with electrochemical detection (ECD) as previously described (Kääriäinen et al, ). The following modifications were made to adapt the method for tissue homogenate matrix.…”
“…The tissue samples were frozen and stored at −70° C until being analyzed. DA levels in both striata were analyzed by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with electrochemical detection (ECD) as previously described (Kääriäinen et al, ). The following modifications were made to adapt the method for tissue homogenate matrix.…”
“…It could also be speculated that because of the higher affinity of endogenous DA for the DRD 3 (vs DRD 2 ), increases in DA would have interfered with buspirone in ƒD 3 more so than in ƒD 2 . However, several studies reported no significant effects of buspirone on DA release using microdialysis in striatal areas in rats (Kaariainen et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2004). In addition, the elevation of DA induced by acute antipsychotics is in the range of 100% (Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1991), and therefore it is unlikely that potential elevation of DA induced by buspirone would lead to significant occupancy of receptors as assessed by PET (Martinez and Narendran, 2010).…”
There is considerable interest in blocking the dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) versus the D2 receptor (DRD2) to treat drug addiction. However, there are currently no selective DRD3 antagonists available in the clinic. The anxiolytic drug buspirone has been proposed as a potential strategy as findings suggest that this drug has high in vitro affinity for DRD3, binds to DRD3 in brain of living non-human primate, and also disrupts psychostimulant self-administration in preclinical models. No study has explored the occupancy of DRD3 by buspirone in humans. Here, we used positron emission tomography (PET) and the D3-preferring probe, [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO, to test the hypothesis that buspirone will occupy (decreases [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO binding) the DRD3 more readily than the DRD2. Eight healthy participants underwent [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO scans after single oral dose administration of placebo and 30, 60, and 120 mg of buspirone in a single-blind within-subjects design. [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO binding in DRD2- and DRD3-rich areas was decreased by the highest (60-120 mg), but not the lowest (30 mg), doses of buspirone. The maximal occupancy obtained was ~25% in both areas. Plasma levels of prolactin (a DRD2 marker) correlated with percentage occupancy after orally administered buspirone. Self-reported dizziness and drowsiness increased after buspirone but that did not correlate with receptor occupancy in any region. Overall, the modest occupancy of DRD2 and DRD3 even at high acute doses of buspirone, yielding high levels of metabolites, suggests that buspirone may not be a good drug to preferentially block DRD3 in humans.
“…The attribution of buspirone-induced changes in (Rabiner et al, 2009), and (2) buspirone increases extracellular dopamine, which may differentially affect the binding of the two radiotracers (Gobert et al, 1999;Kaariainen et al, 2008 (Rabiner et al, 2009), which we attribute to both a small degree of D 2 R binding but also competition from endogenous dopamine released by buspirone (Gobert et al, 1999;Kaariainen et al, 2008). We also cannot exclude underestimation of D 3 R occupancy due to the presence of D 3 R in CB (Ginovart et al, 2007;Rabiner et al, 2009), which could affect occupancy measures when using [ 11 C]PHNO (Searle et al, 2013).…”
Section: Study Limitations and Other Considerationsmentioning
provide evidence that i.m. buspirone blocks D 3 R and D 2 R, whereas oral buspirone is more selective towards D 3 R blockade in vivo, consistent with extensive first pass metabolism and supporting the hypothesis that its metabolites (5-and 6′-hydroxybuspirone) merit evaluation for treating SUDs. They also indicate that for oral buspirone to achieve greater than 80% sustained D 3 R occupancy, as might be needed to treat addiction, higher doses (at least three-fold) than those used to treat anxiety (maximal 60 mg) will be required. Nonetheless, based on previous clinical studies, these doses would be safe and well tolerated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.