2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12944-023-01902-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of twelve noninvasive scores of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

Haoxuan Zou,
Xiaopu Ma,
Fan Zhang
et al.

Abstract: Background The absence of distinct symptoms in the majority of individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) poses challenges in identifying those at high risk, so we need simple, efficient and cost-effective noninvasive scores to aid healthcare professionals in patient identification. While most noninvasive scores were developed for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), consequently, the objective of this study was to systematically assess t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we utilized the original formula as reported by Simental-Mendía et al [ 42 ]. For this reason, the cut-offs obtained in our study cannot be directly compared with those previously published [ 43 , 44 ]. Although using different formulas, Zou et al [ 44 ] and Guo et al [ 43 ] found similarly consistent AUCs for the TyG index compared to those reported in our analysis (AUC 0.746 [95% CI 0.735–0.757] and AUC 0.761 [95% CI 0.747–0.774], respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, we utilized the original formula as reported by Simental-Mendía et al [ 42 ]. For this reason, the cut-offs obtained in our study cannot be directly compared with those previously published [ 43 , 44 ]. Although using different formulas, Zou et al [ 44 ] and Guo et al [ 43 ] found similarly consistent AUCs for the TyG index compared to those reported in our analysis (AUC 0.746 [95% CI 0.735–0.757] and AUC 0.761 [95% CI 0.747–0.774], respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In contrast, TyG-WC had the best diagnostic performance for identifying MAFLD risk in the US population. These findings suggest the need to select the most appropriate predictive model based on regional and racial differences ( 24 ). A Korean population-based study suggests that TyG-WC, TyG-BMI are positively correlated with MAFLD risk and can be used clinically to rapidly identify patients at risk of MAFLD ( 25 ).…”
Section: Diagnostic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%