1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80325-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of different methods of measurement of heart rate-adjusted ST-segment depression during exercise testing for identification of coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was corroborated by classification results for ST/HR hysteresis in our study population (SE=89%, SP = 75%), supporting the idea that the recovery phase of the exercise test provides valuable diagnostic information on cardiovascular disease (OKIN et al, 1989;MORSHEDI-MEIBODI et al, 2002;WATANABE et al, 2001). The whole HR-adjusted ST-based indexes improved EX by approximately 20% over ST indexes in our study population (86% against 65%), which is in accordance with previous works (DETRANO et al, 1986;MORISE and DUVAL, 1995;HERPIN et al, 1995;OKIN and KLIGFIELD, 1995b;LEHTINEN et al, 1996;LEHTINEN, 1999;MORISE, 1997). In HERPIN et al (1995), different HR-adjusted ST-based indexes, not including ST/HR hysteresis, were studied, achieving a higher specificity than standard ST measurement but not better sensitivity.…”
Section: Ecg Indexes Diagnostic Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was corroborated by classification results for ST/HR hysteresis in our study population (SE=89%, SP = 75%), supporting the idea that the recovery phase of the exercise test provides valuable diagnostic information on cardiovascular disease (OKIN et al, 1989;MORSHEDI-MEIBODI et al, 2002;WATANABE et al, 2001). The whole HR-adjusted ST-based indexes improved EX by approximately 20% over ST indexes in our study population (86% against 65%), which is in accordance with previous works (DETRANO et al, 1986;MORISE and DUVAL, 1995;HERPIN et al, 1995;OKIN and KLIGFIELD, 1995b;LEHTINEN et al, 1996;LEHTINEN, 1999;MORISE, 1997). In HERPIN et al (1995), different HR-adjusted ST-based indexes, not including ST/HR hysteresis, were studied, achieving a higher specificity than standard ST measurement but not better sensitivity.…”
Section: Ecg Indexes Diagnostic Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The whole HR-adjusted ST-based indexes improved EX by approximately 20% over ST indexes in our study population (86% against 65%), which is in accordance with previous works (DETRANO et al, 1986;MORISE and DUVAL, 1995;HERPIN et al, 1995;OKIN and KLIGFIELD, 1995b;LEHTINEN et al, 1996;LEHTINEN, 1999;MORISE, 1997). In HERPIN et al (1995), different HR-adjusted ST-based indexes, not including ST/HR hysteresis, were studied, achieving a higher specificity than standard ST measurement but not better sensitivity. In contrast, in our study both sensitivity and specificity were improved by HRadjusted ST indexes (SE = 90%, SP = 79% against SE = 65%, SP = 66%), suggesting that ST/HR hysteresis can increase the sensitivity of the exercise test.…”
Section: Ecg Indexes Diagnostic Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ST‐depression at exercise is known to be reduced by β‐blockers (Gianelly et al ., 1969). The superiority of the heart rate adjusted ST criteria has been claimed by several authors (Okin et al ., 1988; Kligfield et al ., 1989, 1993; Herpin et al ., 1995; Lehtinen et al ., 1996) and also regarding their relative independence of β‐blockade and previous myocardial infarction by Ameisen et al . (1986), Okin et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have also shown ST/HR analysis integrating exercise and recovery to improve the diagnostic capacity of exercise ECG [15][16][17][18]. However, the majority of patients in the previous studies have been men, and hitherto the diagnostic performance of ST/HR hysteresis in women has been unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%