2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-021-02184-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the classical and fracture mechanics approaches to determine in situ stress/hydrofracturing method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou and Xia [28] conducted Brazilian splitting tests on fractured as well as fracturefree rock samples, analyzed the crack propagation law based on the phase-field model of quasistatic fractures, investigated the effect of crack dip angle on prefabricated fractured Brazilian disc samples, and analyzed the effects of crack length and critical energy release rate on crack propagation. In recent years, owing to the rapid development of computer technologies, which has resulted in computers that can repeatedly process complex rock computational problems in a fast and efficient manner, various analysis tools have continuously emerged that have been applied in the research of rock fracture mechanics; these include FEM [29][30], BEM [31][32], DDM [33][34],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou and Xia [28] conducted Brazilian splitting tests on fractured as well as fracturefree rock samples, analyzed the crack propagation law based on the phase-field model of quasistatic fractures, investigated the effect of crack dip angle on prefabricated fractured Brazilian disc samples, and analyzed the effects of crack length and critical energy release rate on crack propagation. In recent years, owing to the rapid development of computer technologies, which has resulted in computers that can repeatedly process complex rock computational problems in a fast and efficient manner, various analysis tools have continuously emerged that have been applied in the research of rock fracture mechanics; these include FEM [29][30], BEM [31][32], DDM [33][34],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress field inversion involves using mathematical and mechanical methods to infer and extrapolate the distribution of in situ stress in a target area based on stress measurements at individual discrete points on-site. Common methods for measuring discrete point stresses include the borehole stress relief method [3][4][5], hydraulic fracturing [6][7][8], and Kaiser effect [9,10]. However, due to cost constraints, underground space limitations, and repeated damage to tunnel surrounding rock, these methods are difficult to apply directly to measurement of the stress in tunnels or deep-level excavations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%