2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954405417728309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the chip formations during turning of Ti64 β and Ti64 α+β

Abstract: For a number of years, the rise in the number of titanium alloy grades and therefore of microstructures has hampered the productivity of titanium parts. In order to understand the phenomena involved, this study presents a comparison of the chip formations between two microstructures obtained from the same alloy. The first part presents the two alloys, their microstructures and their methods of production. The chip formation of each material is then presented and shows two completely different processes. The fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual deformation was found to depend on the orientation of the beta lamellae; however there was no influence on cutting forces when compared with two other microstructures; bi-modal and equiaxed. This influence of beta lamellae orientation was also found by Wagner et al when turning Ti-6Al-4V having two different microstructures, where it was stressed that new material behavior laws are needed to describe the material inhomogeneity [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The actual deformation was found to depend on the orientation of the beta lamellae; however there was no influence on cutting forces when compared with two other microstructures; bi-modal and equiaxed. This influence of beta lamellae orientation was also found by Wagner et al when turning Ti-6Al-4V having two different microstructures, where it was stressed that new material behavior laws are needed to describe the material inhomogeneity [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…should be noticed that the temperature increases rapidly as explained by [24], however, the low thermal conductivity limits the effect on the microstructure and consequently in its evolution (Fig. 13b).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Understanding the mechanisms of chip formation under complex thermomechanical loads require developing dedicated experimental set-up. In the cutting zone, the material undergoes high plastic deformation and local temperature rise that may induce changes in the material microstructure [1,2] as well as its mechanical and physical properties. Establishing the link between the thermomechanical load and the material microstructure evolution leads to develop physical-based models [3][4][5][6] that are suitable for numerical simulation of the machining processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%