2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the biomechanical tensile and compressive properties of decellularised and natural porcine meniscus

Abstract: Meniscal repair is widely used as a treatment for meniscus injury. However, where meniscal damage has progressed such that repair is not possible, approaches for partial meniscus replacement are now being developed which have the potential to restore the functional role of the meniscus, in stabilising the knee joint, absorbing and distributing stress during loading, and prevent early degenerative joint disease. One attractive potential solution to the current lack of meniscal replacements is the use of decellu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
47
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a significant increase in the UTS for both the decellularised peroneal and tibial nerves, as well as strain for the tibial nerves ( P  < 0.05) when compared to their native counterparts. These results were found to be similar in other decellularisation studies (Abdelgaied et al, 2015; Stapleton et al, 2008; Williams et al, 2009). As previously discussed, elastin and collagen fibres contribute to the mechanical properties native nerves (Mason and Phillips, 2011; Tassler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a significant increase in the UTS for both the decellularised peroneal and tibial nerves, as well as strain for the tibial nerves ( P  < 0.05) when compared to their native counterparts. These results were found to be similar in other decellularisation studies (Abdelgaied et al, 2015; Stapleton et al, 2008; Williams et al, 2009). As previously discussed, elastin and collagen fibres contribute to the mechanical properties native nerves (Mason and Phillips, 2011; Tassler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…decellularisation studies (Abdelgaied et al, 2015;Stapleton et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2009). As previously discussed, elastin and collagen fibres contribute to the mechanical properties native nerves (Mason and Phillips, 2011;Tassler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the HHPdecellularized meniscus did not show changes in compression strength after a single 10% strain or in the residual strain after 50 cycles at 20% strain. Previous reports 14,32 JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH ® NOVEMBER 2019 have indicated contradictory results for the mechanical properties of decellularized menisci. For example, Stapleton et al 14 decellularized porcine meniscus by freezethawing and incubation in sodium dodecyl sulfate and found no inferiority of the decellularized meniscus compared with the native meniscus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results obtained in the stress–strain plot (Figure f) and the values of compressive stress for 25%, 50%, and 80% of strain (Figure g) confirm the memory‐shape properties stated before. Depending on test type and conditions, the reported compressive modulus for human meniscus ranged between 0.09 and 0.23 MPa, which is very similar to the range obtained for the 3D bioprinted scaffolds after freeze‐drying (0.15–0.32 MPa) (Table S1, Supporting information). We hypothesize that the scaffolds memory‐shape feature observed can be related to both scaffolds architecture (micro‐ and macro‐porosity) and molecular changes resulting from enzymatic polymerization of tyrosine residues, which promote an increase in crosslinking density and ultimately led to an increase of the scaffolds elasticity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%