2017
DOI: 10.12691/ijebb-5-2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Biodegradation of n-alkanes and Readily Biodegradable Substrates Using Open Mixed Culture under Aerobic, Anoxic and Anaerobic Conditions

Abstract: This study has investigated the biodegradation of n-alkanes using open mixed cultures in batch tests.Biodegradation of n-C12, C14, C16, C18, C20 was investigated using a respirometric method and compared with the biodegradation of the readily biodegradable substrates glucose, acetic acid and ethanol. Experiments were performed in small-scale bioreactors under various conditions, i.e. aerobic, anoxic with nitrate and completely anaerobic conditions, using two different sources of open mixed microbial cultures. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FromFigure 1awe calculated the acclimation time, defined as the time required for the microorganisms to become able to degrade phenol and measured as the time required for the oxygen concentration to drop by at least 1 mg/l. This method of measuring acclimation time, although it is arbitrary, is consistent with our previous studies[14] and allows a consistent comparison between experiments done with the same methodology.Figure 1bshows the acclimation time vs the initial phenol concentration. This plot indicates that the acclimation time was longer for higher phenol concentrations.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…FromFigure 1awe calculated the acclimation time, defined as the time required for the microorganisms to become able to degrade phenol and measured as the time required for the oxygen concentration to drop by at least 1 mg/l. This method of measuring acclimation time, although it is arbitrary, is consistent with our previous studies[14] and allows a consistent comparison between experiments done with the same methodology.Figure 1bshows the acclimation time vs the initial phenol concentration. This plot indicates that the acclimation time was longer for higher phenol concentrations.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The premise is that more soluble hydrocarbons move from polluted soils to water, leading to additional transport and bioremediation (Fernández et al., 2016; Geng et al., 2014; Nicol et al., 1994). Most models formulated for soils are suitable for ex‐situ bioremediation (Ebenhöh & Berthe‐Corti, 2001; Kosterin & Sofinskaya, 2010; Uzukwu & Dionisi, 2017). Further, several works emphasized mathematical approaches that include mass transfer with Monod or first‐order kinetics, concerning hydrocarbon breakdown, specifically those with relatively less solubility (Park et al., 2001; Woo et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, sequestration of this less soluble fraction of oil may occur in soils; its environmental fate is still not sufficiently studied. In soils, the majority of the developed models are designed for ex situ bioremediation [14,[18][19][20]. In addition, only a few mathematical models couple mass transfer with Monod or first-order kinetics for hydrocarbon biodegradation [16,19,[21][22][23], especially for less soluble hydrocarbons [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%