2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the bending performance of solid and cannulated spinal pedicle screws using finite element analyses and biomechanical tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, when conical screws were compared, no meaningful difference was found between cannulated and conventional pedicle screws. [52] Therefore, in this study, only conical screws were used; as expected, no pull-out or broken screw-associated complications were observed in either group. The second main disadvantage is K-wire migration resulting in visceral organ or great vessel wounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the contrary, when conical screws were compared, no meaningful difference was found between cannulated and conventional pedicle screws. [52] Therefore, in this study, only conical screws were used; as expected, no pull-out or broken screw-associated complications were observed in either group. The second main disadvantage is K-wire migration resulting in visceral organ or great vessel wounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The MPO may represent a superior design compared with the SPO and LPO in seeking a balance between intersegmental rotation and cage stress. was found in the present study, a parametric study can only determine the local optimum design because design variables are usually divided into discrete levels [35]. To address this problem, previous studies applied numerical algorithms to optimize porous structures fabricated by selective laser melting [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not found any biomechanical studies on the stability of the iliac screws. Although the cannulated screws have been shown to be more fragile than conventional screws in a biomechanical study with pedicle screws [24], no weakness has been found in clinical studies [22,23]. To avoid any breakage problem while inserting a cannulated iliac screw, we sent the cannulated taper to the end and tried to bury it in the bone tissue with only the polyaxial part of the screw outside.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%