2018
DOI: 10.1556/606.2018.13.3.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the behavior of GFRP reinforced concrete beams with conventional steel bars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, due to their linearly elastic stress-strain relationship up to failure, GFRP reinforcing bars react differently from typical steel reinforcing bars. Furthermore, as compared to steel-reinforced concrete members, the lower modulus of elasticity of GFRP reinforcing bars produces a significant drop in flexural stiffness of GFRP-RC members after cracking and, as a result, greater deflection/deformations under service or loading circumstances [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to their linearly elastic stress-strain relationship up to failure, GFRP reinforcing bars react differently from typical steel reinforcing bars. Furthermore, as compared to steel-reinforced concrete members, the lower modulus of elasticity of GFRP reinforcing bars produces a significant drop in flexural stiffness of GFRP-RC members after cracking and, as a result, greater deflection/deformations under service or loading circumstances [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFRP-RC beams have been reported to exhibit higher load-carrying capacity, higher crack width, and deflections as compared to steel-RC beams. [16][17][18][19][20] Due to the relatively lower modulus of elasticity of GFRP bars as compared to steel, GFRP reinforced beams exhibit linear-elastic behavior up to failure, unlike steel-RC beams which undergo noticeable yielding before failure. [16][17][18] Due to lack of ductility, the margin of safety factor for the design of GFRP-RC flexural member is much higher than that for steel-RC flexural members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noncorrosive properties and the high strength-to-weight ratio of FRP reinforcement provide a perfect solution for optimized structures in aggressive environments. However, a drawback is its low modulus of elasticity compared to steel which results in early concrete cracking at lower service loads [1], as well as the lack of failure ductility in the flexural elements. Therefore, in order to compensate for the sudden failure of FRP-reinforced elements, very conservative safety factors -compared to those used for steel reinforced sectionsare adopted in the design process.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%