Comparison of the Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using Active and Passive Feedback

Abstract

Introduction The outpatient department of any hospital is the first direct point of contact to the patients with the hospital. To understand the difficulties faced by the patients and to understand their perceptions, it is important to assess patient satisfaction. This study was designed to compare the difference in patient satisfaction responses and outcomes using two methods: active feedback collection (AFC) and passive feedback collection (PFC). Methods The study was conducted for a period of 2 months using a validated, structured questionnaire in four languages. To differentiate the questionnaires, those for PFC were marked P and those for AFC as A. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions. PFC was obtained when patients voluntarily filled out the feedback forms placed at different locations, and AFC was obtained by systematically approaching randomly selected patients. Results Of the 809 patients who participated in the study, 131 were passive and 678 active. The study revealed that the satisfaction level was higher in the AFC group. It was observed that 82% of those in the PFC group and 35% of those in the AFC group had given specific written comments. The negative comments were higher in the PFC group than in the AFC group. Conclusions The AFC method gives a good overview of the patients' journeys through the system and it can be used for systemic feedback collection. The PFC method provides an avenue to get more written suggestions and adverse comments that could help in planning remedial measures. The study showed that both methods collect complementary information for the managers to facilitate improvement of services.

Patient and caregiver perspectives of select non-communicable diseases in India: A scoping review

“…The studies included in our review did not include social media ratings of consumers, or unpublished reports of passively collected feedback collected by many hospitals for quality improvement. While this implies that the studies included in this review, which have all employed active feedback, are more representative than reports from passive feedback, studies involving passive feedback are also needed, as they have been shown to provide more information on negative experiences and suggestions for improvement [63].…”

Importance-Performance Analysis of Clinical Forensic Services Quality at Bhayangkara Hospital Pekanbaru, Indonesia

“…Measurements of service quality are done to evaluate and determine the quality of hospital services. Continuous and in-depth measurements can determine service quality more precisely and the results can be used to improve patient satisfaction ( 1 – 3 ). Patient satisfaction is strongly influenced by patients’ perceptions of the services received.…”

“…Service quality can be measured using various methods and instruments but a questionnaire is most often used. Other methods include interviews, focus group discussions and investigations into patient complaints and claims ( 1 , 3 ). Previous studies on the variables affecting service quality and patient satisfaction have revealed various challenges, emphasising the need for continuous attention to issues affecting service quality and to ensuring that hospital managers are informed about potential issues for further problem-solving steps ( 7 , 8 ).…”

Development of clinical forensic service quality questionnaire based on SERVQUAL

“…Continuous and in-depth measurements are expected to be able to measure the level of service quality more precisely, and the results can be used to improve patients satisfaction. 8,9 Service quality measurement tools have been developed and widely used. Several service quality instruments have been developed and used in developed and developing countries.…”