2012
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31825e71a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Amounts of Canal Encroachment Between Semisitting and Supine Position of Computed Tomography-Myelography for Vertebral Fractures of the Elderly Involving the Posterior Vertebral Wall

Abstract: Our study demonstrated that collapse of the nonunited posterior vertebral wall and intracanal protrusion of vertebral fragments would occur simultaneously with axial loading, causing SCE. Computed tomographic scan obtained in semisitting position seems quite useful to evaluate the amount of SCE by an unstable posterior wall.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic data of all patients included age, sex, injury mechanism of fracture, bone density, and spinal canal occupational ratio. The spinal canal occupational ratio was assessed by computed tomography (CT) of the spine using the following equation: 1A/B+C/2×100 where A is the diameter of the spinal canal at the fractured level, B is the diameter of the spinal canal at the superior nonfractured level, and C is the diameter of the spinal canal at the inferior nonfractured level 23 . According to Schnake's morphological osteoporotic fracture classification, all patients in our study met the criteria for type II of osteoporotic fracture: Deformation without or with only minor involvement of the posterior wall (<1/5) 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basic data of all patients included age, sex, injury mechanism of fracture, bone density, and spinal canal occupational ratio. The spinal canal occupational ratio was assessed by computed tomography (CT) of the spine using the following equation: 1A/B+C/2×100 where A is the diameter of the spinal canal at the fractured level, B is the diameter of the spinal canal at the superior nonfractured level, and C is the diameter of the spinal canal at the inferior nonfractured level 23 . According to Schnake's morphological osteoporotic fracture classification, all patients in our study met the criteria for type II of osteoporotic fracture: Deformation without or with only minor involvement of the posterior wall (<1/5) 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A is the diameter of the spinal canal at the fractured level, B is the diameter of the spinal canal at the superior nonfractured level, and C is the diameter of the spinal canal at the inferior nonfractured level 23 . According to Schnake's morphological osteoporotic fracture classification, all patients in our study met the criteria for type II of osteoporotic fracture: Deformation without or with only minor involvement of the posterior wall (<1/5) 24 .…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1-A/(B+C)/2] * 100 where A is the diameter of the spinal canal at the fractured level; B is the diameter of the spinal canal at the superior nonfractured level; and C is the diameter of the spinal canal at the inferior nonfractured level [19].…”
Section: Study Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%