2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the absolute mass sensitivity of ring electrode QCM and standard QCM using electrodeposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3†). 55 Interestingly, this ternary FeO x /NiO x /Pt/GC catalyst was superior to several other catalysts toward FAO, according to the literature (see Table 3). 11,31,56–64…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…S3†). 55 Interestingly, this ternary FeO x /NiO x /Pt/GC catalyst was superior to several other catalysts toward FAO, according to the literature (see Table 3). 11,31,56–64…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…but also fully satisfies the three conditions of the Sauerbrey equation. In addition, Gabrielli, and Hu et al used electrochemical deposition coating to verify the mass sensitivity of the QCM [ 43 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Theory and Measuring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous research found that the mass sensitivity of the ring electrode QCM is higher than that of the conventional QCM with a symmetrical electrode [ 19 ]. These abovementioned studies showed that QCMs with asymmetrical electrode structures improve mass sensitivity greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%