2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016003281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the ability to identify cardiometabolic risk factors between two new body indices and waist-to-height ratio among Chinese adults with normal BMI and waist circumference

Abstract: When evaluating cardiometabolic risk factors among non-obese adults, WHtR was a simple and effective index in the assessment of cardiometabolic risk factors, BRI could be used as an alternative body index to WHtR, while ABSI could not.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
21
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The World Health Organization Working Group on Obesity recommends WC cutoff values of 85 cm for men and 80 cm for women, which are lower than those determined here (95.5 and 88.5 cm for middle-aged and elderly men, respectively; and 83.5 and 83.5 cm for middle-aged and elderly women, respectively). Our BMI ranges (23.86-24.01 for men and 24.08-23.57 for women) were similar to those in previous studies (22.65-24.12 for men and 23.53-27.7 for women) [17,31,32,35], and the same was true for WHtR (0.54-0.55 for men and 0.51-0.52 for women in the present study vs 0.47-0.54 and 0.47-0.54, respectively, in previous reports) [17,24,31,32,35,36,[38][39][40]. Notably, values obtained in a study conducted in Spain (WC, 90.5 cm; BMI, 26.6; WHtR, 0.54 for both sexes) [34]were much higher than those in Asian cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The World Health Organization Working Group on Obesity recommends WC cutoff values of 85 cm for men and 80 cm for women, which are lower than those determined here (95.5 and 88.5 cm for middle-aged and elderly men, respectively; and 83.5 and 83.5 cm for middle-aged and elderly women, respectively). Our BMI ranges (23.86-24.01 for men and 24.08-23.57 for women) were similar to those in previous studies (22.65-24.12 for men and 23.53-27.7 for women) [17,31,32,35], and the same was true for WHtR (0.54-0.55 for men and 0.51-0.52 for women in the present study vs 0.47-0.54 and 0.47-0.54, respectively, in previous reports) [17,24,31,32,35,36,[38][39][40]. Notably, values obtained in a study conducted in Spain (WC, 90.5 cm; BMI, 26.6; WHtR, 0.54 for both sexes) [34]were much higher than those in Asian cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…BMI showed the strongest association in adults [18] or only in one sex [10,17,18], while associations for 3 parameters were nonsigni cant for men after adjustments [5]. However, others have reported results similar to ours [21,[23][24][25][26][27], including a cohort study in which subjects in the highest quartile of WHtR were 4.51 times more likely to have hypertension [28]. A systematic review also found that WHtR was the best parameter for predicting cardiometabolic risk factors, including hypertension [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, BRI is limited in predicting percentage of fat mass in elite athletes when compared with other commonly and readily available field methods such as bio‐impedance analysis or skinfold prediction models 63 . Several recent studies have shown that BRI could be used as an adipose indicator for determining the presence of eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy, 64 hyperuricaemia, 41,65 arterial stiffness, 66–69 CVD, 70,71 diabetes, 41,72–75 dyslipidaemia, 41,76–78 hypertension 41,79,80 and MetS 41–55 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRI is a predictor of body fat percentage and visceral adiposity tissue, and its values range from 1 to 16 35 . Although studies have compared the prediction of MetS by BRI with traditional and novel anthropometric indices, 41–55 there is currently no meta‐analysis indicating whether BRI is a better predictor of MetS than BMI, WC, WHR, WHtR, ABSI or BAI. Therefore, this meta‐analysis aims to investigate whether BRI is superior to BMI WC, WHR, WHtR, ABSI or BAI in predicting MetS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesar de los esfuerzos realizados a nivel de salud pública, la obesidad ha aumentado en las últimas décadas, convirtiéndose en uno de los principales factores de riesgo de morbilidad y mortalidad [1][2][3] . En el año 2014, más de 600 millones de adultos a nivel mundial presentaban esta enfermedad 4 .…”
unclassified