1996
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(96)00053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the abilities of eight acoustic techniques to detect and size a single bubble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest displacements are observed at the lens center making it most susceptible to error. Estimating bubble radius using optical methods or nonlinear acoustical methods based on bubble resonant effects may be more accurate (Leighton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest displacements are observed at the lens center making it most susceptible to error. Estimating bubble radius using optical methods or nonlinear acoustical methods based on bubble resonant effects may be more accurate (Leighton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question is to what extent that answer is accurate, which cannot be ascertained without independent measurements, and certainly is a question which should be asked whenever the environmental conditions differ significantly from the forward model on which the physics is based (Leighton et al 1998b(Leighton et al , 2002Boyd & Varley 2001;Manasseh et al 2001). While such independent measurements can be conducted to validate the technique (Leighton et al 1996(Leighton et al , 1997, in the field they may not be available, and so tests should be performed to examine whether the estimated bubble spectral generation rate can be discounted. A minimum test (which tests the process, not the model) is to determine whether the measured acoustic spectrum is reconstituted, when the estimated bubble spectral generation rate is inserted into the forward problem.…”
Section: The Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Use of the above methods is well-known in relation to the detection of bubbles during decompression, or phospholipidcoated micro-bubbles in order to increase ultrasonic image contrast. 13,14 The peculiarity of measurement conditions at this paper is primarily that the environmental parameters and structures exposed to the optical emission and emerging acoustic°ows are constantly changing. Secondly, the emerging bubbles have a wide range of sizes: from a few microns, which are prone to cavitation, to ones which are 100s of microns across and which can be observed visually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%