2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of test specimen preparation techniques for pervious concrete pavements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
54
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these benefits, the potential for lower compressive strength, clogging, ravelling, and susceptibility to freezing and thawing damage, have limited the use of pervious pavements in cold climatic conditions [6]. When compared to conventional concrete, pervious concrete exhibits sustainability, because of its properties [7]. Some notable characteristics of pervious concrete are lower unit weight and drying shrinkage, higher permeability, higher thermal insulation, lower compressive, tensile and bond strength, lower pressure on framework during construction, and longer curing time required prior to form removal, elimination of capillary attraction, and economy in materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these benefits, the potential for lower compressive strength, clogging, ravelling, and susceptibility to freezing and thawing damage, have limited the use of pervious pavements in cold climatic conditions [6]. When compared to conventional concrete, pervious concrete exhibits sustainability, because of its properties [7]. Some notable characteristics of pervious concrete are lower unit weight and drying shrinkage, higher permeability, higher thermal insulation, lower compressive, tensile and bond strength, lower pressure on framework during construction, and longer curing time required prior to form removal, elimination of capillary attraction, and economy in materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazilian Portland cement CP IV-32 was used as water-activated binder, analyzed following the Brazilian standard NBR 5736:1999 [10]. Since there are no established methodologies to define the composition of pervious concrete, it was reviewed earlier works in the effort to identify the most common compositions used [14][15][16][17][18]. Based on these data, we developed mixtures containing different amounts of RCA (336, 350, 398, 485, and 539 kg/m 3 ) and coarse aggregate (1289, 1297, 1307, 1400, and 1628 kg/m 3 ) looking for the one with the best relationship between cohesion of fresh mixture and resistance.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Putman and Neptune's study (2011), the samples consolidated with the proctor hammer were most similar to the actual pavements using the same mix design than the other compaction methods. When comparing cylinders to the pavement and slabs to the pavement, it was determined that the cylinders typically overestimated the pavement density while the slabs were more representative of reality (Putman and Neptune 2011). The cylinders were 0.5 ft in diameter and 1 ft in height and the slabs were 0.5 ft in thickness and either 1x1 ft, 1.5x1.5 ft, or 2x2 ft in length and width.…”
Section: -Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the void content of a PC mixture increases, its density decreases accordingly, hence lower densities lead to lower strengths (Putman and Neptune 2011). A significant factor on the density of PC is the compaction method, the point of which is to eliminate large voids to strengthen the concrete without closing the voids needed for infiltration (Putman and Neptune 2011). Putman and Neptune explored different compaction methods in their 2011 study on the three methods of rodding, proctor hammer, and dropping (Putman and Neptune 2011).…”
Section: -Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation