2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2014.07.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of temperature limits for Trench silicon IGBT technologies for medium power applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, two potential short-circuit failure modes that limit the device short-circuit endurance time tw are illustrated in Fig.13. One is the thermal runaway failure during the steady state ( ○ 7 ), the other one is the thermal runaway failure during the blocking state ( ○ 8 ) [26,[50][51]. Both of them are initiated by the thermal accumulation during the short-circuit pulse without any other failure mechanism setting in.…”
Section: Short-circuit Endurance Time Limiting Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, two potential short-circuit failure modes that limit the device short-circuit endurance time tw are illustrated in Fig.13. One is the thermal runaway failure during the steady state ( ○ 7 ), the other one is the thermal runaway failure during the blocking state ( ○ 8 ) [26,[50][51]. Both of them are initiated by the thermal accumulation during the short-circuit pulse without any other failure mechanism setting in.…”
Section: Short-circuit Endurance Time Limiting Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional IGBTs can be operated at higher current densities with lower frequency while the MOSFETs have better efficiency at higher operating frequencies over 100 kHz. In contrast, recently developed SiC MOSFETs have much smaller channel mobility compared to conventional ones [17]- [18] which reflects increase in total cost. On the other hand, the thermal conductivity of SiC is much higher than that for silicon [18], so dissipated heat can easily be removed from the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, recently developed SiC MOSFETs have much smaller channel mobility compared to conventional ones [17]- [18] which reflects increase in total cost. On the other hand, the thermal conductivity of SiC is much higher than that for silicon [18], so dissipated heat can easily be removed from the device. Regardless promising material properties of SiC, Si devices can still be more reliable and economically efficient based on the current rating and switching frequency of a specific application [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%