Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of techniques to screen and characterize bacteria-specific hybridomas for high-quality monoclonal antibodies selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, skimmed milk was the best blocking reagent whereas BSA resulted in a high background for a foodborne pathogen antibody array [27]. On the other hand, both skimmed milk and BSA were found to be the most effective blockers for an antibody for hybridoma screening [28]. In addition, several commercially available blocking buffers were evaluated and shown to be effective in eliminating non-specific binding in a microsphere immunoassay [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, skimmed milk was the best blocking reagent whereas BSA resulted in a high background for a foodborne pathogen antibody array [27]. On the other hand, both skimmed milk and BSA were found to be the most effective blockers for an antibody for hybridoma screening [28]. In addition, several commercially available blocking buffers were evaluated and shown to be effective in eliminating non-specific binding in a microsphere immunoassay [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors believe incorporation of such high throughput capabilities for screening of phage clones, for both their DNA sequencing and binding capacities, would greatly increase the success rate of obtaining phage clone(s) with the desired target specificity. The use of a high throughout technique such as a microarray system could lead to better and faster screening, as has been demonstrated recently for the high throughput screening of hybridmonas [37]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() used an electrochemical detection of specific DNA, combined with the evaluation of respiratory activity, to assess Escherichia coli . Other rapid methods include MALDI‐TOF‐MS (Nicolau et al ., ), hyperspectral scattering (Tao et al ., ), ultrasound and ELISA (Charlermroj et al ., ). These methods show a high level of specificity, but a limitation could be the high cost of the equipment required for the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although conventional culture methods are still commonly used to ensure the microbiological quality of milk, some studies were performed to identify culturable microbial communities by means of molecular identification tools (Hantsis-Zacharov & Halpern, 2007); for example, Zhu et al (2012) proposed a combination of impedance and rRNA-based lateral flow assay to assess the contamination by Cronobacter sakazakii in 29 h, whilst Yamanaka et al (2012) used an electrochemical detection of specific DNA, combined with the evaluation of respiratory activity, to assess Escherichia coli. Other rapid methods include MALDI-TOF-MS (Nicolau et al, 2012), hyperspectral scattering (Tao et al, 2012), ultrasound and ELISA (Charlermroj et al, 2012). These methods show a high level of specificity, but a limitation could be the high cost of the equipment required for the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%