2004
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73142-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Techniques for Measurement of Rumen pH in Lactating Dairy Cows

Abstract: Subacute rumen acidosis is thought to be a common condition in early lactating dairy cattle; however, diagnosis is difficult. There are currently only two techniques available for measuring rumen pH under field conditions: rumenocentesis and oral stomach tube. Sixteen rumen-fistulated cows were sampled in four sites of the rumen (cranial-ventral, caudal-ventral, central, and cranial-dorsal) with a rumen cannula. Rumen pH results were compared to those obtained at the same time with rumenocentesis and with an o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
267
4
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
23
267
4
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to surgically-modified animals is not universal, and therefore less invasive techniques, such as oral stomach probing, have been used as an alternative. In the relatively few studies that have compared sampling through the rumen cannula or by stomach probing, differences in fermentation profile and microbiota have been reported in some (e.g., Geishauser and Gitzel, 1996;Duffield et al, 2004) but not all cases (e.g., Lodge-Ivey et al, 2009;Shen et al, 2012;Terré et al, 2013). Part of the discrepancy between studies may reflect differences in the procedures used to avoid salivary dilution and contamination, the type of samples collected and rumen sampling site.…”
Section: Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Access to surgically-modified animals is not universal, and therefore less invasive techniques, such as oral stomach probing, have been used as an alternative. In the relatively few studies that have compared sampling through the rumen cannula or by stomach probing, differences in fermentation profile and microbiota have been reported in some (e.g., Geishauser and Gitzel, 1996;Duffield et al, 2004) but not all cases (e.g., Lodge-Ivey et al, 2009;Shen et al, 2012;Terré et al, 2013). Part of the discrepancy between studies may reflect differences in the procedures used to avoid salivary dilution and contamination, the type of samples collected and rumen sampling site.…”
Section: Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The pH values tend to peak in the moments before feed intake, begin to fall afterward, and reach the minimum between 3 and 6 h after feed intake depending on the ration (Duffield et al, 2004;Marden et al, 2005;Palmonari et al, 2010). As acid production decreases, volatile fatty acid absorption and rumen buffer capacity (mainly from saliva) increase, and pH begins to recover initial values; this process is estimated to last approximately 18 h (Whitelaw et al, 1970;Maekawa et al, 2002;Palmonari et al, 2010).…”
Section: Daily Ph Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Για τη μέτρηση του pH του στομαχικού περιεχο μένου των αγελάδων περιγράφονται δύο μέθοδοι στη διεθνή βιβλιογραφία: 1) Στιγμιαία μέτρηση, μετά από λήψη περιεχομένου με στομαχικό καθετήρα ή, προ τιμότερα, με παρακέντηση της μεγάλης κοιλίας και μέτρηση του pH με κατάλληλη συσκευή και 2) συνεχής (μακροχρόνια) μέτρηση, με τοποθέτηση ειδικής συσκευής-πομπού στη μεγάλη κοιλία (μετά από χει ρουργική επέμβαση και δημιουργία μόνιμου συριγ γίου) που αποστέλλει τις μετρήσεις του ρΗτου περιε χομένου της σε ειδικό δέκτη, συνδεδεμένο με ηλε κτρονικό υπολογιστή, καταγράφοντας έτσι τις τιμές του pH ολόκληρο το 24ωρο (Duffield et al 2004). Η τελευταία μέθοδος βρίσκει εφαρμογή για ερευνητι κούς σκοπούς και όχι στην κλινική πράξη.…”
Section: μέτρηση τον Ph τον περιεχομενον της μεγάλης κοιλίαςunclassified